Updates from June, 2011 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • rogerglewis 6:37 am on June 27, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    The Road Ahead. 

    Was Watching A Michael Lydon  Video earlier , What got me started with Music ( See below) he Quotes Bob Dylan,” Those that aren’t busy Living are Busy Dieing” . For some reason it lead me to want to share a post I made in a Guitar Forum explaining why I don’t play my guitar all the time and Why performing isn’t the main objective for me that said I am now starting to think about Joining Starting a band ,so never say never.

    [quote=”Jorge”]PLEASE ROGER…..PLAY YOUR GUITAR…POR FAVOR

    [/quote]

    Philip I have been messing about with it for an hour and it is very much like logic it gels with Amplitube very well and has a really nice graphic interface I think a half day of familiarisation and I’ll be good to go it is amazingly economical on CPU
    useage   and it will be interesting to see what the recording reproduction quality is Like.

    Jorge the technical aspects of recording music and the production side of internet broadcasting for community based Blog broadcasting   is something of a passion of mine. I posted this in the Home Recording and tutorials section as others might find this programme helpful.

    I love to play guitar and enjoy it very much this technical stuff  is the basis of my ongoing plan to make  a sustainable  Business here in Sweden My areas of interest on the technical side are Digital Signal Processing, Midi Based Hexaphonic Guitar Pickup conversion and Modeling , Recording projects services and editing. Johannas Cousins Husband Shaw does something in the same field although I have been developing a Web based Business plan for the past 5 years waiting for the critical mass of computing power to be net worked Sweden is very advanced both in terms of Broadband infrastructure and Hardware in the hands of a viable consumer base. So  things like reaper are amazingly exciting for me as it brings very powerful production tools within every ones budget  which gives the synergy across online communities to collaborate and interface on creative projects using Video and sound not soley for Music and the Arts although to me that is important but not at a business level.

    My other interests are Alternative Energy particularly Nikola Telsas ideas on electromagnatism.  my  researches in both Pick up technology , Tube and transistor amplifiers and Digital System Processing have all been very helpful
    in my Energy interests\study\research My guitar Hobby\obsession is not limited to playing, I  also enjoy writing both Music and Lyrics which again does not  revolve around a performance aspect to my own interest. I have very little interest in performing personally I am however very interested in recording and  videoing live performance and facilitating self help tutorial based learning for cooperative communities for all sorts of technical skills involved with and used  in  sustainability and ecological  projects.
    I have been developing a business plan for producing Bio Diesel from industrial hemp and looking at cooperative models for Hemp and Bio diesel electricity generation for a component based
    community energy project with bio diesel back up generation as a adjunct to wind, photo voltaic, geo thermal, water turbine according to geographic propensities.
    Fuel cells and batteries are obviously fields which again there are cross disciplinary synergies between Music Computers and Energy projects. Other cooperative ventures with complimentary by product industries growing out of the core economic base of the Energy project are all linking back and the technical side of Music all help and are portable knowledge sets for application in the other fields.
    It might seem a stretch to get from
    Reaper recording software to Bio diesel and a suggestion of why don’t you play your guitar Roger?
    I’m not sure if the above answers the question  but
    in short I get as much out of thinking about music and its technical side as I do from physically doing it
    and performance  competency on the guitar is not a priority for me I am happy to get to where ever I end up in that direction organically over time.

    This is one of the most inspiring videos I have ever seen its linked from the War on Want Web Site which is how I originally found it but it is from here that I re found it to post here, It literally made me cry the first time I saw it for the first time in several years,tears of Hope

    .http://www.redpepper.org.uk/film-energy-sovereignty-in-brazil/

    This second film I have not watched yet I’m downloading it now Telsa was an interesting character still surrounded by a lot of controversy.

     And heres my post regarding Michael Lydon andhisJazz Book,The Dylan quote  and His Jass blues Waiting for Godot.

    [quote=”Roger”]Thought I’d do a Music Book Reveiw thread I’ll call it Six Swinging Strings. Michael Lydons Book is the best introduction to Jazz and more formal theory at an accessible level he writes beautifully and engages  the reader from the first lines and he is a great guy to boot.
    [img]http://i394.photobucket.com/albums/pp30/RogerGLewis/511sHXTdp0L_SL500_AA300_.jpg[/img]

    [url]http://www.amazon.com/How-Play-Classic-Jazz-Guitar/dp/0415979080[/url]

    Well I guess I’m Going to turn this into  my 15 books thread too. Michael is a great guy, his enthusiasm is infectous.

    I love this  Jazz Blues too The Bass is great and Elen on Piano is a real treat.

    Michaels Interview on Memories of Rolling Stone Magazine filmed in 2007 before the crash I’m guessing.Its interesting how much things have slid back since those optomistic words.Itstime for us all to re discover some of the Idealism,Radicalism and enthusiasm for new and progressive ideas set in a 21st Century Context and thats what this Blog is about.

    Bio Diesel From Hemp Oil.

    Revolving  Doors to Corporate Fascist World Governement. Say No Today and from now on.

     
  • rogerglewis 6:23 am on June 25, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    MUSO MUSINGS On Fatherhood Theory and STuff: The Revolving Door of Governement and Corporation… 

    MUSO MUSINGS On Fatherhood Theory and STuff: The Revolving Door of Governement and Corporation…: “Dumping of toxic waste in the UK Between 1965 and 1972, Monsanto paid contractors to illegally dump thousands of tons of highly toxic wast…”

     
  • rogerglewis 6:16 am on June 25, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    The Revolving Door of Governement and Corporations AKA Fascism. 

    Dumping of toxic waste in the UK
    Between 1965 and 1972, Monsanto paid contractors to illegally dump thousands of tons of highly toxic waste in UK landfill sites, knowing that their chemicals were liable to contaminate wildlife and people. The Environment Agency said the chemicals were found to be polluting groundwater and the atmosphere 30 years after they were dumped.[72]
    The Brofiscin quarry, near Cardiff, erupted in 2003, spilling fumes over the surrounding area, but the local community was unaware that the quarry housed toxic waste.
    A UK government report shows that 67 chemicals, including Agent Orange derivatives, dioxins and PCBs exclusively made by Monsanto, are leaking from one unlined porous quarry that was not authorized to take chemical wastes. It emerged that the groundwater has been polluted since the 1970s.[73] The government was criticised for failing to publish information about the scale and exact nature of this contamination. According to the Environment Agency it could cost £100m to clean up the site in south Wales, called “one of the most contaminated” in the UK.[74]
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame
    Revolving Doors from Global Corparates and Banks and Government in G8 countries welcome to the Brave New World of Fascism!

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4972000.stm

    The first cut and Paste regarding dumping of Toxic waste could equally be a metaphor for the dumping of  Toxic Assets into Dummy Banks to be left in Public Ownership when Banking Profits Fresh with the new seeds of QE Fiat money brought into existence with Public Debt ,  continue to enjoy Huge Private Profits.

    There is an Urgent need for new Anti-Trust Laws. When I was a teenager I wanted to start a Band called Implicit Collusion. Lets Goógle It.

    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Implicit+Collusion


    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Implicit+CollusionCLICK HERE


    Examples

    Collusion is largely illegal in the United StatesCanada and most of the EU due tocompetition/antitrust law, but implicit collusion in the form of price leadership and tacit understandings still takes place. Several examples of collusion in the United States include:
    There are many ways that implicit collusion tends to develop:
    • The practice of stock analyst conference calls and meetings of industry participants almost necessarily results in tremendous amounts of strategic and price transparency. This allows each firm to see how and why every other firm is pricing their products.
    • If the practice of the industry causes more complicated pricing, which is hard for the consumer to understand (such as risk-based pricing, hidden taxes and fees in the wireless industry, negotiable pricing), this can cause competition based on price to be meaningless (because it would be too complicated to explain to the customer in a short advertisement). This causes industries to have essentially the same prices and compete on advertising and image, something theoretically as damaging to consumers as normal price fixing.


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collusion




    Franklin D. Roosevelt

    The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism — ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power.
     
    — Franklin D. Roosevelt, “Message from the President of the United States Transmitting Recommendations Relative to the Strengthening and Enforcement ofAnti-trust Laws”[9][10]










     
  • rogerglewis 6:44 am on June 19, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    A BIT MORE ON US Mortgage Fraud ( By the Banks not the borrowers) 

    Naked Capitalism Link

    This link refers to cases where syndicated mortgages have not been properly conveyed in the US
    I am looking for instances in the UK where I am suspicious that similar misdeeds abound.

    These improper syndicated Mortgage pools are driving the Foreclosure( repossession) Agenda and the longer term sensible work out of short term problems for borrowers cut  loose in a Mortgage Desert of the the banks own design is adding insult to injury. The actions of the Banks in saving themselves are being placed above the Law and there is little protection if any by government of the ordinary Borrower \ tax payer.

     
  • rogerglewis 6:16 am on June 19, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    Export Boom predicted for D&G Straight Jackets 

    This just in From Milan.
    Following extensive research on the current management of the Lunatic Assylm D &G have identified that the Lunatics are indeed in control. Expect to see many wonderful creations on the Autumn Cat Walks as the
    Taste for all things Chic should lure the International Elites into something rather safer for the rest of us.

    Guido may be gloomy but he really does call it as he sees it and I reckon he calls it spot on.
    No pulled punches but knowing the truth has to be the preferred way out of this mess.
    The Lunatics are now running the Asylum, lets start making straight Jackets I predict strong international export markets.
    gUIDOS tEMPLE OF THE aBSURD

     
  • rogerglewis 11:03 am on June 18, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    Democracy vs Mythology: The Battle in Syntagma Square 

    Democracy vs Mythology: The Battle in Syntagma Square.

     
  • rogerglewis 10:42 am on June 10, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    Bankings innovation on the Faustian Pact 

    Hello Judderbar,

    Taxes are at the bottom of this as is the cost of having the money created to pay the taxes ( interest on debt money).

    Actually a new bond that Ford suggests is not draining money from the economy it is just adding to it just without the interest element. It does in effect dilute the value of the money already in existence but thast is also the case with how  the money is loaned into existence by the banks today. the effective money supply inflates in both cases.

    The very public cost of the bail outs of the banks  have been very galling to the public due to several reasons.

    First the apparent lack of humility of the banks. This crisis  is seen to be and i think rightly so, to be a crisis of their own design.

    Second the Banks were quick to re open business as usual on the Gravy train created by the Bail out money from QE
    whilst letting the rest of the real economy or Main street go to hell.

    thirdly the combination of austerity measures and tax rises that have been the further cost to the citizens of the countries that have been involved in the system, most dramatically in the bailed out countries.

    Finally it would seem even with the huge price extracted for their services the Banks are still insolvent and are now intent in forcing perfectly prudent borrowers into distress by collapsing markets for real property by strangling the money supply and foreclosing to meet the 3rd party obligations ( CDO’s) that should never have been entered into in the first place.

    More regulation may have kept a degree of sensible prudence in the system and it is also the case that more prudent systems of raising government  spending should also have been adopted . They were not as in short, being more transparent politicians don’t like them it would keep them accountable for their promises.

    It really is a case of a plague on both their houses but just because both sides of the equation need to be addressed does not mean that it can not be solved. Someone pointed out possibly elsewhere in this forum that Bankers and Politicians seem to be the only people that do not accept responsibility for their actions they always claim either the electorate or the borrowers demands made them do it.

    So Judder Bar it would seem that this is the root of this problem , who is the guilty party or is it a faustian pact in which the contracting parties agree to send the unsuspecting third parties soul  to hell. it remains to be seen if that sort of promissory note has any worth in this real world maybe not even at the end of the  barrel of a gun.

     
  • rogerglewis 7:46 am on June 9, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    Have Banks Killed their Golden Goose 

    Positive Money Forum • View topic – People here are misunderstanding modern banks: “If you say so? rather a lot of people seem to be getting rather upset about Basle 3 if it really is that simple and perhaps when the fat lady has sung it will become that simple again.
    For now I fear the Goose that laid the golden egg is up for the chop.

    The Goose with the Golden Eggs

    by Aesop

    A CERTAIN MAN had the good fortune to possess a Goose that laid him a Golden Egg every day. But dissatisfied with so slow an income, and thinking to seize the whole treasure at once, he killed the Goose, and cutting her open, found her – just what any other goose would be!

    Moral:
    Much wants more, and loses all.

    Source:

    Aesop’s Fables
    Copyright 1881
    Translator: unknown
    WM. L. Allison, New York
    Illustrator: Harrison Weir, John Tenniel, Ernest Griset, et.al.”

     
  • rogerglewis 6:39 am on June 9, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    Some more Notes on Mortgages, Securitisation and Repossession/foreclosure. 

    I am developing my model of how the securitisation Food Chain of mortgage debt is structured. My latest discovery is that the Default and foreclosure agenda is driven by distribution contracts for the securitised Mortgage pools, nothing to do with the original Lender/borrower relationship.

    Further insights from the American experience of MERS and the infamous recent cases of banks trying to foreclose properties never the subject of a mortgage charge in the first place are all very illuminating. My task is slightly complicated by the difference between the US and UK laws and the further complication of Mortgage and securities Laws being State originated and not Federal. All good stuff and actually quite enjoyable to study when one gets locked into the obsessive detail.

    Anyway heres my typical cut and paste mix and match, I started my spreadsheet model today and hope to develop it to a publishable state in a week or so. It may well be sooner if inspiration strikes and the Gods of Google are helpful in answering well targeted search terms.

    So far this morning I have tried.

    7:35 AM
    6:46 AM
    5:51 AM
    The following notes a titbits from those searches.
    I have also come across an excellent Blog that has been documenting some very good research
    into the securitisation factors in all of this.


    Anyway heres my cut and paste.



    p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Times New Roman}

    Juddebar, have you seen this film.


    Its a very good film available widely on the internet to download it gives a good account of the
    depth of dysfunction now attendant in the current banking system.
    The initial mortgage contract as represented Banks matching deposits it takes to Investments others
    wish to make is absolutely fine and this contract n=must of course be enforceable.
    The Misrepresentation/Fraud Bit.
    1. The Banks do not match 100% deposits in fact 96% or more of the money is a bookkeeping entry
    ( Thin air)
    2. The Banks Take the promise to pay back the 96% thin air and securitise that income ( Usufruct )
    3. In event of default, The Bank achieving anything above 4% of the original mortgage advance
    recover the capital reserve at risk.( a huge Conflict of interest over the borrowers interest where
    they have equity)
    4. The banks have a conflict of interest in that by forcing borrowers to take losses on their assets by
    strangulating the money supply they make capital profits on either foreclosures or are getting back a
    portion of the thin air that was never real in the first place.( further conflict of interest)
    In addition to the need for more regulation of banks it is also essential that the creation of money
    through debt is taken out of their hands and placed in a Public Trust or other vehicle. This hugely
    profitable natural monopoly should not be gifted to commercial interests it is truly ridiculous.


    Juddebar, have you seen this film.


    Its a very good film available widely on the internet to download it gives a good account of the depth of dysfunction now attendant in the current banking system.

    The initial mortgage contract as represented Banks matching deposits it takes to Investments others wish to make is absolutely fine and this contract n=must of course be enforceable.

    The Misrepresentation/Fraud Bit.
    1. The Banks do not match 100% deposits in fact 96% or more of the money is a bookkeeping entry ( Thin air)
    2. The Banks Take the promise to pay back the 96% thin air and securitise that income ( Usufruct )
    3. In event of default, The Bank achieving anything above 4% of the original mortgage advance recover the capital reserve at risk.( a huge Conflict of interest over the borrowers interest where they have equity)
    4. The banks have a conflict of interest in that by forcing borrowers to take losses on their assets by strangulating the money supply they make capital profits on either foreclosures or are getting back a portion of the thin air that was never real in the first place.( further conflict of interest)

    In addition to the need for more regulation of banks it is also essential that the creation of money through debt is taken out of their hands and placed in a Public Trust or other vehicle. This hugely profitable natural monopoly should not be gifted to commercial interests it is truly ridiculous.



    Uses

    Risk, Return, Rating & Yield relate
    There are many reasons for mortgage originators to finance their activities by issuing mortgage-backed securities. Mortgage-backed securities:
    1. Transform relatively illiquid, individual financial assets into liquid and tradable capital market instruments.
    2. Allow mortgage originators to replenish their funds, which can then be used for additional origination activities.
    3. Can be used by Wall Street banks to monetize the credit spread between the origination of an underlying mortgage (private market transaction) and the yield demanded by bond investors through bond issuance (typically, a public market transaction).
    4. Are frequently a more efficient and lower cost source of financing in comparison with other bank and capital markets financing alternatives.
    5. Allow issuers to diversify their financing sources, by offering alternatives to more traditional forms of debt and equity financing.
    6. Allow issuers to remove assets from their balance sheet, which can help to improve various financial ratios, utilise capital more efficiently and achieve compliance with risk-based capital standards.
    The high liquidity of most mortgage-backed securities means that an investor wishing to take a position need not deal with the difficulties of theoretical pricing described below; the price of any bond is essentially quoted at fair value, with a very narrow bid/offer spread.[citation needed]
    Reasons (other than investment or speculation) for entering the market include the desire to hedge against a drop in prepayment rates (a critical business risk for any company specializing in refinancing).

    [edit]







    Recording and MERS

    One of the critical component of the securitization system is Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS) created in 1990s, which made legally possible to re-assign underlying mortgages without cumbersome recordation process in county courts as customary required. Indeed, since every time a financial instrument containing mortgages is sold, every mortgage (deed of trust) and note (obligation to pay the debt) presumably have to be re-recorded in US County courts and recordation fees have to be paid. So, the financial industry eager to trade in Mortgage Based Securities needed to find a way around those recordation requirements, and this is how MERS was born to replace public recordation with a private one. The MERS legal standing is currently widely challenged, with focus on legal inconsistencies, which originally looked trivial, but in fact may reflect dysfunctionality within the entire mortgage securitization approach itself and therefore have a profound impact on financial system.

    [edit]
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortgage-backed_security

    That said, what you want to watch if you’re looking at a servicer is the category of loans that are 90+ days delinquent but not yet REO. That may not be anyone’s largest pile of delinquent loans (out of the total of 30-60-90-120-FC-REO), but it’s the one that is the expense-hole. Anyone who is letting that bucket get bigger at a faster rate than it is racking up 60-day delinquencies has a problem. Every loan that is 90 days down this month was 60 days down last month, so out-of-proportion increases in the 90+ category means that the trouble is on the liquidation (escape) side, not just the credit deterioration (entry) side: BKs or legal-document troubles are delaying foreclosure, or nobody really wants to foreclose right now because the bids are going to suck so badly. Dragging it out, though, just makes the servicer wait that much longer to get paid and eats away at what the investor will recover. It’s expensive to carry REO and market it, but you can’t list it until you own it and you can’t sell it until you list it. There are ways to win at the servicing game, but there are also many ways to lose.



    The end of the long story is that “normal” mortgage environments have lots of opposing forces in more or less equilibrium: the originator, the investor, the servicer. When the environment is not normal, distortions come in and risk levels can appear that are not “historically” usual (and everybody acts surprised). There is going to be some major whining, moaning, and gnashing of teeth by mortgage originators, should we have a real-live credit crunch, that you won’t necessarily hear from mortgage servicers, who have been taking it the shorts all these boom-years and are about to start getting profitable, assuming that delinquent-servicing costs don’t explode on them. If they have the staff to handle the FCs and BKs and REOs, it’s gravy because the investor and insurer are going to end up covering those costs as long as they’re justifiable. If you’re an inefficient servicer whose expense reports don’t pass the investor’s smell test, you’ll lose money if the REO doesn’t sell fast enough. If you’ve been puzzled about what motivates the “nuclear waste” buyers, now you know—they aren’t looking for yield on a note, they’re looking for profit on distressed-loan servicing. The reason they’re offering such crap bids is that the REO isn’t moving fast enough, which increases their expenses and thus eats into their profits. (That and the fact that the loan documents are such a giant mess in so many of these deals that it will take the Olympic Lawyer Relay Team to sort it out.)
    http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2007/04/foreclosure-sales-and-reo-for-ubernerds.html
    Non-judicial foreclosure is almost always faster and cheaper for the lender than a judicial foreclosure. Most of the time, when there is a choice, the lender chooses the non-judicial option for that reason. The big benefit to the lender of a judicial foreclosure is that the lender can ask the court, when appropriate, to enter a “deficiency judgment” against the borrower; this makes the borrower liable for any difference between the proceeds of the sale and the debt owed when the borrower is upside-down. Practically speaking, a lender who chooses non-judicial foreclosure generally waives its right to seek a deficiency judgment. The lender’s calculation, obviously, comes down to weighing the benefit of quick sale and reduced expenses against the cost of (potentially) writing off part of the debt.



    Trustee shall apply the proceeds of the sale in the following order: (a) to all expenses of the sale, including, but not limited to, reasonable Trustee’s and attorneys’ fees; (b) to all sums secured by this Security Instrument; and (c) any excess to the person or persons legally entitled to it.

    For our present purposes, the important part of this is the last sentence, regarding the order of application of the sale proceeds. Notice that after expenses and the mortgage debt are satisfied, any excess proceeds belong to the borrower (or a junior lienholder, if there is one). As a practical matter, of course, there are rarely any proceeds left for the borrower; if the property can fetch that much, it is usually sold before things get that bad. The point here is that a lender cannot take advantage of a borrower with a big equity cushion who for some reason is unable to make payments but also unable or unwilling to sell the property himself. You have to understand that in order to understand how lenders bid at auctions (and how other people bid to compete with them).



    A large part of this grief is that too many consumers (and their betters in the press, quite often) confuse the “exposure time” of a property they just bought with its likely “marketing time” should they need to unload it some day, and confuse “appraised value” with liquidation price. An appraisal prepared for a lender in a mortgage loan transaction is not intended to give you liquidation value, or the price someone would pay you today if you were so distressed as to need that cash pronto. The value indicated in the appraisal is contingent upon the allowance of reasonable exposure and marketing, and assumes that the seller is typically motivated, not desperate. Those appraisals prepared during the boom, when all the buyers were “typically” desperate to buy, may now be considered waste paper.

    Therefore, foreclosure and REO sales are not “comps” or comparable sales used by appraisers to form an opinion of the value of a normally sold property. That doesn’t mean they don’t affect prices or marketing time: a market full of REO is a market full of existing homes somebody wants to get out from under and will likely undercut other sellers to do so. I have used the term “flood the market” before in reference to REO. I don’t just mean “flood” in the sense of a lot of REO. I mean “flood” the way we used to mean it when our cars had carburetors instead of fuel injectors. If that metaphor doesn’t make sense, we’ll have to let the engineers tinker with it in the comments.













    Mortgage Broker and some reaction to call to sell more mortgages?






    Jim, I concur with your position and will add that I believe government control on mortgage originator compensation will not only restrict would-be homebuyers from entering the market, but increase the foreclosure rate as well. Take for example a conversation I had last week with Lori, a recently divorced mother of 3, who could barely make ends meet. When her monthly escrow was raised by $60, she could not make her mortgage payments. While her lender gave her a 3-month payment reduction, after that term she found herself in the same position and was foreclosed on 4 months later. I asked Lori if the lender suggested she review her homeowners and other insurance to see if she was paying for unneeded coverage. I also asked if the lender suggest she appeal her property tax bill for a property located in an area that suffered a 40% reduction in values. What about reducing her withholdings to give her more disposable income each month? The answer to each of these questions was “No, the lender never suggested these things.” It’s possible that had Lori been able to reduce the aforementioned expenses, she may have been able to make her monthly payments and keep her house. As for 1st-time homebuyers, most require loan amounts less than move-up buyers. When the economy turns around, and more buyers are seeking financing, those of us who offer the same high level of guidance regardless of loan amount may be incented to disregard the smaller loan amounts. Right now, we have the option of offering a rate with a premium commensurate with our effort. The smaller loans require the same effort to close as larger ones, often more. If we don’t have the option of charging a premium for the smaller loan amounts, we’ll be forced to make a decision as to how much time we wish to allot to the smaller loans. Sure, there will be discount lenders who will be happy to cater to the smaller loan amounts. But, will these discount lenders provide the guidance that Lori really needed?
    Russell Bear
    on
    Mortgage Bankers/Brokers, Real Estate Briokers, and used car salesman…all one in the same. Saying that mortgage banking is an honorable profession, after the mess that we have been in is akin to saying McDonalds is a vascular surgeons friend. These professions are all necessary evils in a world of insurmountable greed. Wow! “Key facilitators for the future of housing in America”? There are far too many mortgage product out there with the invent of the interest only mortgage, stated income, and ARM’s for mortgage banking to be stable and positive for housing and our economy. Going back to 10-20% down 15-20 yr terms and low rates will keep people in their homes! Without a vested interest in their home people will continue to walk away. Causing a backlash fannie and freddie ie the GOVERNMENT ie taxpayers. Not that you care b/c you have made your money (originating/bundling/selling) and you are on to the next trick.



    Secondary Marketing Risk Management
    A successful mortgage banking company must maximize profits while minimizing the variability of those profits in the long run. With volatile markets, unpredictable origination volumes, and complex new mortgage products, the task can be daunting. Institutions must take a simultaneously optimized and integrated approach to pricing, risk reporting, hedging, pooling, and loan delivery. Otherwise, consistently achieving optimal profits is not possible.

    Since 1987, QRM has been partnering with clients and applying modern option theory to all aspects of secondary marketing, in order to manage risk and maximize all-in risk-adjusted profitability. QRM’s Mortgage Banking Practice includes the entire secondary marketing process—from pricing, risk reporting, trade management, pool and hedge optimization, to loan delivery. QRM’s clients have hedged trillions of dollars of mortgage originations under virtually every imaginable market scenario and include over 65 of the nation’s most sophisticated lenders, including the top 10.

    QRM clients create optimal secondary marketing strategies that produce a predictable flow of profits limited only by the amount of business coming in and the degree of competition in pricing. Clients accurately price and measure the exposure of all their loan products and use robust best execution analysis to accurately hedge, pool, and deliver those loans. QRM clients make informed decisions which preserve profitability and decrease earnings volatility, thereby increasing shareholder value.

    Increase Profitability through Comprehensive Pricing of Loan Products
    QRM clients model virtually every mortgage product or related hedge instrument, including all conforming, jumbo, alt-A, sub-prime, hybrid, reverse, interest-only, and other adjustable rate loan types. As part of that analysis, QRM clients model all possible loan delivery options, including mortgage securities, cash trades, whole loan bids, assignments-of-trades, and CMO securitization. Our Trading Analytics Research group is committed to dissecting new financial instruments and passing the best practice modeling methods on to our clients.
    Our clients build refined and transparent, profitability-driven loan pricing processes that keep them ahead of the curve. These processes accurately incorporate forward price, interest carry, loan pricing adjustments, base and excess servicing values, hedge costs, overhead costs, and other attributes. QRM clients are assured that their processes for rate sheet-generation truly incorporate comprehensive, all-in analysis.
    Precisely Model Rate Lock Optionality in Your Mortgage Pipeline
    QRM clients perform precise and comprehensive daily interest rate risk exposure analysis, covering all aspects of their positions no matter the fallout profile, driven by deterministic factors such as the purpose, origination source, or type of product. Clients create parallel, non-parallel, or key rate interest rate shocks using robust option-adjusted spread (OAS) analytics to determine a single-number index of net exposure. In addition, clients perform contingency analysis showing how exposure and hedge position sensitivities change in response to market movements. These processes use the variable quantity option model to measure all the financial properties of a mortgage rate lock, whether the rate lock is a standard, float-down, floating subject to a cap, or path-dependent rate lock. Hedge costs are computed to precisely reflect the different risk attributes of each.
    On a periodic basis, our Behavioral Modeling group performs advanced statistical analysis of each client’s actual rate lock-fallout experience to determine the sensitivity of their mortgage pipeline to interest rate changes, and other deterministic variables. Clients then quickly adopt these findings in their framework to accurately reflect their borrowers’ fallout behavior.
    Incorporate Best Execution Analysis into Underlying Pricing, Hedging, and Delivery Decisions
    Before engaging QRM, many secondary marketing operations find that their best-intentioned analytical packages lack the seamless integration necessary in the fast-paced secondary marketing process. QRM clients incorporate best execution analysis at every step of their process; pricing, hedging, and pooling; from rate lock inception, through loan closing, to the delivery of each loan. Clients are also able to make improvements to the initial execution at any stage in the process.
    Our clients’ processes combine the speed, ease, analytical pick-ups, and integration that make optimizing loan selection and trade allocation extremely profitable and efficient. Clients determine the all-in value of alternative loan sale executions, based on current investor prices, buy-down and buy-up factors, attribute-driven guaranty fees, retained servicing preferences, multi-faceted investor constraints, and parameters determining the earliest opportunity for loan delivery.
    Accurately and Thoroughly Measure Exposure and Hedge Risk under Any Scenario
    QRM consultants help clients identify risk exposures and set a risk policy customized to their needs. Clients build robust hedge, trade management, and loan delivery processes incorporating every delivery-based and cross-hedge instrument that a mortgage bank might trade. Clients generate hedge optimization recommendations that meet their risk policy and trading preferences.
    Pool and Deliver More Profitably
    Maximizing pipeline value while also taking advantage of investor appetites for specified pools has always been a secondary marketing challenge. QRM clients utilize a powerful rules engine that models their business processes within a rigorous optimization analysis. These rules can incorporate eligibility and aggregation constraints, as well as expected pay-ups, to achieve optimal loan slotting. QRM clients utilize a variety of loan delivery vehicles— security and cash, specified pools, heterogeneous bid packages, and non-conforming securitization (integrating with the client’s Intex CMO Database).
    Effectively Report to Provide Business Intelligence Necessary to Actively Manage Risk
    Clients not only have access to 200 risk management reports germane to all aspects of secondary marketing and management, they also create custom reports that effectively and concisely deliver accurate business intelligence. Clients use industry-standard Online Analytical Processing (OLAP) and Microsoft Reporting Services technologies to generate customized report books that can be distributed as web pages, Excel files, or Adobe PDFs.
    Against this macroeconomic backdrop, Norges Bank is concerned that risk weights for residential mortgages have fallen for many of the larger Norwegian banks because they are increasingly using their own internal rating based (IRB) models to calculate their capital requirements. These rely on historical loss data, which has remained low in Norway, even during the 1990s Nordic banking crisis. Such low risk weights fail to reflect the risks from households with a high, and rising, debt burden: at year-end 2010, debt as a percentage of disposable income was just under 200%.
    The exhibit below shows that the average risk weights on mortgage loans range between 10% and 14% for a selection Norway’s banks using IRB models. According to Norges Bank, other European countries tend to have risk weights of 13%-20% although there is considerable variation by country and by individual bank. The exhibit also shows how much lower the risk weights are than in the Norwegian standardised model, which is favoured by the majority of smaller banks. Such a wide variance in weights is counterintuitive as mortgage loans should be one of the most homogenous products offered by banks.



    Bank of America Puts Moratorium on All Foreclosures

    By Michael Kraus on October 8, 2010
    Real quick update here:
    I guess this was probably inevitable, but wow… Bank of America is suspending all foreclosures nationwide as legislators and attorney generals call for investigations in foreclosure documentation practices.  This comes after Senator Richard Shelby called for the Senate Committee on Banking Housing and Urban Development to conduct an investigation into industry practices.  The day prior Rep. Edolphus Towns, the Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform requested a nationwide foreclosure moratorium.
    The big mortgage foreclosure mess just gets bigger and bigger.  The outcome of everything is uncertain, but rest assured we will see reams of litigation filed as foreclosures across the county are called into question.  I expect sales of foreclosed properties will grind to a halt while this is sorted out.



     
  • rogerglewis 11:43 am on June 8, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    Positive Money Forum • View topic – Mortgages – Grip of Death or Total Scam or Both? 

    Positive Money Forum • View topic – Mortgages – Grip of Death or Total Scam or Both?: “Punish The Seller?
    You are still missing the point the seller is long since out of the equation when it comes to repossessions/foreclosures they release their rights when the contract between the Mortgagor( borrower ) and mortgagee( Bank) is made. Other third parties introduced by the bank without the Mortgagors knowledge are another matter altogether.

    AN old Law lecturer once explained that in contract law the ‘ee’ was he that gets it the exception being mortgage law where the ‘ee’ was actually the ‘Or’, I am beginning to think that perhaps the ee’s and ors are the right way around after all the Bank seems to get rather more for rather less don’t you think?

    Who are the Winners and Losers in the 100 acre wood said eyore?
    RogerGLewis

    Posts: 18
    Joined: Tue 24th May, 2011 (01:19)”

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel