More Climate censorship. GreenPArty Admin wields the Ban Stick.

Climate Catastrophe Pornographers masquerading as Green Party members and spreading their own ignorant biases, not a good look for free speech and democracy.

Earl Bramley-Howard 10:58am Feb 2 Ok I will remiove you as you clearly cannot take the warnings. My position is supported by the vast majority of ‘Climate Scientists’ (Steyn is most certainly NOT a climate scientist) There is no ad hominem… I think your entire reason for being in this group is to cause arguments based on climate science denial. I’ve seen you do it before and warned you before. I see no ‘evidence’ from you (or Steyn). What I do see is denial dressed up in clever obfuscation and all the smoke and mirrors straw man arguments I’ve come to expect from so-called ‘educated’ deniers. You use polemic as the intro and it’s down hill from there. Take it elsewhere.

“Insurance firm research reveals steep increase in flash floods and says rise is in line with climate change”

Insurance firm research reveals steep increase in flash floods and says rise is in line with climate change
THEGUARDIAN.COM|BY ARTHUR NESLEN

LikeShow more reactions

Comment

Comments
Earl Bramley-Howard
Earl Bramley-Howard Roger Lewis Please take you climate change denial elsewhere!! Any more and I will simply remove you from the group for trolling. #admin warning 2

“A 2004 profile of Steyn in the Boston Phoenix described him as “the most toxic right-wing pundit you’ve never heard of” “See More

Mark Steyn
DESMOGBLOG.COM

Earl Bramley-Howard
Earl Bramley-Howard Is any of the evidence about Steyn in desmog, incorrect?
I read it… did you?
Your stance is antagonistic to the vast body of scientific evidence.
The co2 is plant food video is over 6 years old… yes it is silly… because the claims by Monckton et al, are utterly ridiculous.
You don’t fool me with this “I believe in climate change” position, because it is clearly a set up to denying the evidence about the causes of that change.
I am not going to continue with this discussion… I will simply remove you from the group if it continues.
Final #admin warning.

Tony Seaman
Tony Seaman Roger Lewis, your argument surely, is with the insurance companies who, you might think, have been so seriously mistaken. Perhaps you should send your data to them. I would welcome an update on their response to – not your comments, but theirs.

Roger Lewis
Roger Lewis The Guardian have reported this and it has been posted as a confirmation of biases towards certain claimed causes. The article is not balanced as it does not mention building on flood plains or the neglect of Dykes and drainage schemes extensively provSee More

LETTHEMCONFECTSWEETERLIES.BLOGSPOT.COM|BY ROGER LEWIS

Tony Seaman
Tony Seaman As I said, I think you should be dealing with the insurers. Perhaps you could get them to suggest they have been misquoted. We can all read the papers.
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s